Huge win for freedom


There are some, among them a certain troll who likes to hijack my blog’s comments for his small-minded rants, who are of the opinion that journalists must be accredited and licensed in order to hold that “lofty” title. I disagree wholeheartedly; had that sort of constraint been in place 250 years ago, individuals such as Patrick Henry would have been proscribed from publishing their treatises against the King of England, and we might still be no more than ragtag pommy colonies.

Apologies in advance to any Brits offended by the preceding paragraph. I was just being cheeky.

No, the tradition of the citizen-journalist is at the very bedrock of rights the founding fathers held most dear. Troll-boy’s protestations to the contrary, the reporting of news and spouting of opinion by mere commoners is of vital importance to the health of a republic.

And now a federal judge agrees.

Boston lawyer Simon Glik was arrested on October 1, 2007 when he used his cell phone to record officers making a drug arrest, and later sued the city and the officers for violating his rights. After the officers tried to having the lawsuit dismissed on the basis of qualified immunity, a Federal Appeals Court denied the motion last week and ruled that filming and photographing police is in fact protected by the First Amendment. They also note that the rights extend not just to professional news gatherers, but ordinary citizens as well:

“[...] changes in technology and society have made the lines between private citizen and journalist exceedingly difficult to draw. The proliferation of electronic devices with video-recording capability means that many of our images of current events come from bystanders with a ready cell phone or digital camera rather than a traditional film crew, and news stories are now just as likely to be broken by a blogger at her computer as a reporter at a major newspaper. Such developments make clear why the news-gathering protections of the First Amendment cannot turn on professional credentials or status”.

How big is this news? Beyond big.

As I reported well over a year ago, it is a felony crime in the State of Maryland People’s Republic of Maryland to take video of the Maryland State Police Schutzstaffel in the course of executing their duties (such as shooting pet dogs, for example). Or, should I say, it was.

Now that we can confidently record the jackbooted jagoffs in action, I’m willing to bet that their behavior toward we mere commoners might just be a little less strident. We can only hope.

6 Responses to “Huge win for freedom”

  1. thefrollickingmole Says:

    Good news, what it means in effect is new police trainees have to be told “act like you are on camera at all times, treat people with respect”..

    It is possible to be creative with cameras and create one sided videos, but on the whole they add a great deal to supervising the cops as well as civillians.

  2. Merilyn Says:

    Meanwhile here in Australia, Julia and her gang [The Greens] are trying very hard to close down freedom of speech.

    http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/enemies_of_free_speech/

    • bingbing Says:

      So that’s why she STOPPED following the Andrew Bolt is a C**T twitter feed?

  3. gregoryno6 Says:

    We interrupt your regular broadcasting….
    Gina Elise, she of Pinups for Vets fame, needs your votes in the Life Opens Up competition.
    http://lifeopensupproject.com/player.php?q=89
    The contest closes on Thursday. That’s their Thursday, not our Thursday. Either way, it’s not much time.
    Click. Watch. Vote. Please.
    We now return you to the scheduled program.

  4. albie Says:

    I agree we’re just as important. In the old days, there were no degrees. There’s a kind of club amongst journalists. They’re fed the PR faxes before anyone and that it makes reporting much easier. News means money and advertising dollars.

  5. headhunter Says:

    Stupid laws enforced by stupid people. As a constable in the UK, if I’m ever told or realise I;m being filmed I positively encourage it! Because I’m confident in my approach, my abilities and my reasonable nature and have no issue with it being made public. It also tends to stop the habitual complainants in their tracks, as the footage generally shows them actually fishing for a bite, and thus acting unreasonably. But we should always be careful of selective editing, and press for the whole story to be shown.

    “I’m filming you copper!”
    “Splendid sir, make sure you catch my best side, and it’s only fair to warn you that should you have a complaint, that your phone or camera may be seized as evidence, something I’m certain you’ll be happy to do in verifying your complaint against me, yes?”

    And always, always time for a snap shot with the myriad tourists who stop me each year for a quick snap because, to them, a UK bobby, silly hat and all, is still novelty! Last time was a couple weeks ago, a group of thoroughly charming young Aussie students, even with a few beers inside them at 1am! And when I say “charming” I mean i a “Christ, if I was 20 years younger!” kind of way. But lovely ladies too!


Well, SAY something...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers

%d bloggers like this: