The Chinese government has been accused of carrying out secret inquiries on the backgrounds of athletes, officials and journalists going to this summer’s Olympics – so it can ban anyone who opposes the regime.Tory MEP Edward McMillan-Scott claims China’s Ministry of Public Security has drawn up a document detailing how people are to be assessed – and listing 43 categories to be kept out.
Any athlete, member of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), journalist, sponsor or guest who has been on a peaceful demonstration in support of the independence of Tibet should be excluded, according to the alleged document.
Also allegedly due for checks are representatives of the “host city for the next Olympics”, suggesting figures like London 2012 Games chairman Lord Coe and London Mayor Ken Livingstone will be screened for their political views on China.
The Beijing-based Public Security Ministry – responsible for policing 1.3 billion people – allegedly lists what type of people should be barred.
They include members of religious groups and terrorist organisations and sections of the media “who endanger the Olympic Games”.
A category entitled “China’s enemies” includes the families of people killed in anti-government protests, such as Tiananmen Square, “overseas hostile forces” and “individuals who disturb social stability”.
And listed under “separatists” is the Dalai Lama’s Government of Tibet in Exile and members of its affiliated organisations as well as “individuals who partake in parades, demonstrations and protest activities with the goal of breaking up nations”.
Prince Charles, a long-time supporter of the Dalai Lama, has already said he will not attend the Olympics. But under the alleged criteria he would be on the blacklist.
Journalists attract particular scrutiny, with bans to be extended to “staff of any foreign media hostile to the People’s Republic of China” and “staff of media who publish anti-communist articles and those who viciously slander the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese government”.
The secret checks will also look out for “individuals who form unlawful religious groups”.
Mr McMillan-Scott, a long-standing critic of the Chinese regime, said last night that he had been assured the details were accurate and he believed them to be so.
They were passed to him by exiled members of the Falun Gong spiritual movement, a philosophical and exercise regime that has been persecuted in China since 1999.
Mr McMillan-Scott said: “There is absolutely no question in my mind that it is a genuine document. The Falun Gong have an incredible network of communications and they penetrate every area of Chinese life.
“This document epitomises the way the Chinese state operates against any form of dissidence, any form of nonconformist religion and any form of opposition to the established order.”
Erping Zhang, spokesman for Falun Gong in the USA, added: “The document came from inside the Chinese security bureau.
“Some people who are secret Falun Gong practitioners are in the security bureau. They passed us this information last year and we know it is genuine.
“We feel the Chinese authorities are politicising the Olympic Games. It should be a movement open to all individuals regardless of gender, race, religion or politics.”
IOC Director of Communications Giselle Davies said: “We can’t comment on this because we do not know the source.
“However, we have every reason to believe that the accreditation procedure will work as it has done in the past.
“We have had assurances from the organisers that the usual procedures will be followed, which would involve only the normal security checks and balances.”
Last week, The Mail on Sunday told how British Olympic chiefs were forcing athletes to sign a contract promising not to speak out about China’s appalling human rights record or face being banned from Beijing.
The controversial clause had been inserted into athletes’ contracts for the first time and forbade them making any political comment about countries staging the games.
Just a day later, following an international outcry, the offending clause was dropped from the contract.
A British Olympic Association spokeswoman said last night she was unable to comment about the contents of the list but said: “At the Olympic Games it is standard procedure to carry out security checks on everyone attending, like competitors, IOC members and Association staff.”
A London representative of the Chinese government refused to comment.
February 17, 2008, 4:00 pm at 4:00 pm
Quick! There’s still time for everyone sympathetic to Tibet to hold rallies in support of its independence and freedom. China can than compete against itself.
February 17, 2008, 4:54 pm at 4:54 pm
I had that same thought. If ever there was a case for boycotting the Olympics, this is surely one, but it’s easier to get on their no-no list.
What if China held the Olympics and nobody came?
February 17, 2008, 5:54 pm at 5:54 pm
Rebecca, it would still be a display of how wonderful China is, and all of it’s goodness. It especially helps that facts have never made a lick of difference before… any they certainly don’t want to start now!
February 17, 2008, 6:50 pm at 6:50 pm
All of that is good and well, I’m just wondering where on earth those big ass rubber bands for the stadium.
I had seen on this al-Gor invention, about a year or so back that Chinese had a bit of a problem in their Western areas with Islam.
I would imagine the Chinese have cured that, by now. Herbal recipe probably. The recipe is quite simple, really. If you thought that GRAPHIC video posted was bad, it’s nothing compared to that simple Chinese “herbal recipe”.
February 17, 2008, 7:21 pm at 7:21 pm
Tizona, China’s main benefit is that they refuse to take shit, such as Islam.
February 17, 2008, 10:28 pm at 10:28 pm
I’m just glad to see that the West doesn’t have the market cornered on atrocious architecture.
WTF is that POS?!
February 18, 2008, 12:24 am at 12:24 am
The building looks bandaged together — and as a retired nurse, I’ll hazard the opinion that it was bandaged together rather badly. They say that architecture reflects society; pitiful.
Of course, we have Geary, that author of so many buildings that look like crumpled up aluminum foil, with all the attendant building flaws (leaks and such) one might expect.