Australia has a national broadcaster, the ABC. It is fully government funded, and, as are most institutions of that type, of a fiercely left wing bent.
One case in particular has been its treatment of the illegal immigrant issues over the last decade or so. No allegation made by the ABC has been more long lasting than the one that the previous government deliberately lied about children being thrown overboard from refugee boats.
However it takes a special type of ignorance to ignore the senate report into the incident, which clearly states that it
A: Had happened before
B: Was threatened numerous other times.
C: Failed, and still fails to give ANY account of some of the violence and threatening/intinmidating behaviour faced by the Australian boarding parties.
There is a direct link to that behaviour and the deaths of 5 people, not including others lost previously when an asylum seekers boat was deliberately sunk by some of those on board. Yet the ABC still mentions “children overboard” as though there was no reason for the government of the day to have believed the reports. I have absolutely no doubt if Barnett hadnt spoken out this would be played out as an unexplained accident rather than an act of brinkmanship gone wrong.
More below the fold.
Here is the Senate report into the children overboard affair, it gives a very good idea of the activities of asylum seekers leading up to the affair in question. I will reproduce it in full and highlight the sections of particular interest.
1.1 Twelve Suspected Illegal Entry Vessels (SIEVs) were intercepted by the RAN under the auspices of Operation Relex.SIEV 1 arrived on 7 September 2001 and the last illegal entry vessel, SIEV 12, arrived on 16 December 2001.
1.2 SIEVs 5, 7, 11 and 12 were escorted back to Indonesia. SIEVs 4, 6 and 10 sank at some point during the interception or tow-back process. Their passengers were rescued, with the loss of two lives on SIEV 10, and transported in the first instance to Christmas Island.
1.3 Evidence to the Committee demonstrated a clear pattern of objectionable behaviour practised by those abroad the Suspected Illegal Entry Vessels. This conduct was calculated to achieve their objective of reaching Australian territory and also exert ‘moral blackmail’ upon the defence force personnel attempting to thwart this objective.
1.4 This pattern of behaviour included acts and threats of self-harm and aggression, including threats to children, sabotage of vessels and of equipment, jumping overboard and the attempted creation of safety of life at sea situations.
1.5 Examination of this pattern of conduct was important in the conduct of the Committee’s inquiry. It established the context or atmosphere in which Operation Relex and the events surrounding the interception of SIEV 4 were conducted. The Committee heard that even by the time of the interception of SIEV 4 a pattern of conduct among those on board SIEVs had emerged. For example, concern was expressed by both military and civilian participants that those on board SIEV 4 were wearing life jackets. As Ms Halton recalled:
…officials were expecting SIEV 4 unauthorised arrivals to be more difficult to handle than previous arrivals. The fact that passengers were wearing life jackets and had made attempts to disable their vessel was consistent with this.
1.6 According to the evidence of Rear Admiral Smith:
Numerous instances of threatened or actual violent actions against Australian Defence Force personnel occurred, as well as various acts of threatened or actual self harm and the inciting of violence throughout Operation Relex. Australian Defence Force personnel had not previously encountered these circumstances during non-warlike operations. They were extremely hazardous and volatile situations. What was a law enforcement activity had real potential to rapidly escalate into a violent situation or just as quickly deteriorate into a major safety or preservation of life situation or, worse, both.
1.7 Evidence was also presented to the Committee that the behaviour exhibited was an organised response by people smugglers which evolved over time. As Vice Admiral Shackleton put it:
It was our understanding that they were learning from each event that they interacted or experienced with us and that they were starting to understand our approach to how we operated. It would not be unreasonable to expect that they were trying to find ways to counter what we were doing. Hence we found, in this particular instance, SIEV4 was giving the appearance of being better prepared and more aggressive than the previous ones that we had dealt with.
1.8 This chapter outlines the emergence of this pattern of behaviour, drawing mainly from written statements provided by the naval personnel involved in these operations. Evidence is presented in relation to incidents aboard ten of the twelve SIEVs, with multiple incidents reported for some boats. SIEV 4 is not addressed in this Chapter. No evidence is presented in relation to SIEV 10, which sank with the loss of two lives, as this matter is under consideration by the Western Australian coroner.
1.9 The Aceng, which came to be designated as SIEV 1, was intercepted by the HMAS Warramungaon 7 September 2001 headed towards Ashmore Island. Warnings to the master of the vessel, delivered in English and Bahasa, not to enter Australian waters proved unsuccessful and the Warramunga inserted a boarding party as the vessel crossed into the Australian Contiguous Zone. The boarding was to be the first of four.
1.10 On the first two occasions the vessel was turned northwards back towards Indonesia, but reset a course for Ashmore Island once the boarding party was extracted. On the second occasion that the boat was turned back, the Master indicated that his life would be in jeopardy if he did not head for Australia.
When the Master realised that again he was heading North towards Indonesia he became nervous and after pointing to himself made slashing motions at his neck and said ‘Indonesia’. The Master continued to plead with me to turn back to the South or he would be killed.
1.11 On the third occasion that a boarding party was put aboard to direct the boat out of Australian waters, the behaviour of those on board became abusive, with threats of harm to the boarding party, smashing of windows in the wheelhouse, and objects thrown at the boarding party personnel. An assessment was made by the Boarding Office that medium to high force with possibly lethal force would be required to secure the Aceng, and the boarding party was withdrawn to avoid further conflict.
1.12 At first light on 8 September another boarding party embarked the vessel and all 237 passengerswere transferred to the HMAS Manoora without further incident. They were transported to Nauru for processing.
1.13 Suspected Illegal Entry Vessel 2, carrying 130 mainly Afghani unauthorised arrivals, was located on or about 9 September 2001having already run aground on Ashmore Reef. The condition of the boat was so poor that those on board were transferred to SIEV 1, which had already been emptied but was anchored a short distance away.
1.14 On 9 September the crew from the HMAS Gawler, which was at that time the On Scene Commander, conducted a compliant search of the those now aboard SIEV 1 and located 15 blades of various sizes, and two ‘improvised nightsticks’. A search of baggage brought the total number of knives recovered to approximately 30.
1.15 On 10 September, in a discussion with naval personnel concerning their eventual destination, one of the English speaking passengers indicated that his people would ‘throw themselves overboard if they were taken back to Indonesia’.Access to an interpreter and a journalist was also requested at this time, but the passengers were advised that due to the remote location of Ashmore neither was available.
1.16 By 12 September a group of 4 or 5 young men had become more agitated and made an undefined threat of suicide. They also indicated that they would not accept any more food and water.
1.17 On 13 September, SIEV 1 and the refloated SIEV 2 were roped together to relieve cramped conditions on SIEV 1, and the situation calmed with no more incidents reported. The unauthorised arrivals were embarked aboard the HMAS Tobruk on 22 September for transport to Nauru.
1.18 SIEV 3, the 40 metre wooden cargo vessel KMSumber Bahagia, was intercepted by the HMAS Warramunga north of Australia’s Contiguous Zone on 11 September 2001. Once again warnings to the vessel not to enter Australian waters were ignored, and after entering the contiguous zone the vessel was boarded and returned to international waters. A head count at this time identified 115, all Iraqi, potential illegal immigrants aboard, including thirty children, and five Indonesian crew. The boat was later determined to be carrying 129 potential illegal immigrants in total. 
1.19 On extraction of the boarding party the SIEV turned south but appeared disoriented, on a course which would miss Ashmore Island but reach the Australian mainland in about 36 hours. Another Rigid Hulled Inflatable Boat (RHIB) was dispatched from the Warramungato warn the vessel again against entering Australian territory, and advise that they should be headed north-west. This approach was greeted with assertions from passengers aboard the SIEV that the boat was ‘broken’, a charge contradicted by the master. The passengers also advised RHIB that they would not alter course as they wished to go to Australia.At this point a passenger from the SIEV climbed down its side and attempted to enter the RHIB.
1.20 Some hours later the erratic course of the SIEV raised concerns about the vessel being lost and the potential for a safety of life at sea (SOLAS) situation to develop. The Warramunga, which had been tracking the SIEV from beyond its visual range, then moved within sight of the boat and dispatched a RHIB with a marked chart which was provided to the master of the vessel. While a member of the party aboard the RHIB was explaining to the Master the course he had to steer, ‘the Master gestured with his hand his throat being cut indicating that he was not safe’.
1.21 The SIEV responded to the provision of the chart by changing course for Ashmore Island, and was boarded. As embarkation of the boarding party commenced one woman ‘was seen holding a child over the side and threatening to throw the child over the side’. The boarding party ‘met with violence from the [potential illegal immigrants] and thus could not secure the wheelhouse’.The boarding party disconnected the steering from the wheelhouse and commence to steer the boat from the aft on the weatherdeck. Witness statements report the passengers becoming very aggressive towards the boarding party on noticing the change of direction.
1.22 As the Executive officer of the HMAS Warramunga described the situation
Tension aboard the SIEV continued as the vessel tracked west with the male PIIs [potential illegal immigrants] becoming very aggressive and surging as a mass towards the BP [boarding party]. The situation continued to worsen with all male PIIs [potential illegal immigrants] starting to riot and threaten the BP [boarding party] as a mass. I assessed that the situation could not be controlled without the use of high force and possibly lethal force. Having two unarmed BP [boarding party] members (the doctor and the interpreter) and no sign of the situation de-escalating without casualties I informed the Commanding Officer that I was conducting an emergency extraction.
1.23 Shortly after the boarding party left, the SIEV made a hard turn towards the Warramunga and the Commander of the navy vessel was forced to use maximum engine power to avoid a collision.
1.24 From then on the SIEV ignores all warnings from the Warramungathat it was headed for the dangers of Ashmore Reef and refused to follow the navy vessel to the safety of Ashmore lagoon. When continuing negotiations failed, the Commander of the Warramunga became alarmed at the potential risk to those on board, with 54 children now known to be amongst the passengers.
There appeared to be no formal hierarchy amongst the PIIs [potential illegal immigrants] and shouting, confusion, anger and aggression was the norm.The final demand from them and the only consistent one in the end was for them to embark the WARRAMUNGA. At 2151 a SOLAS situation was imminent. It was dark night with no moon, the reef was 2.5nm ahead. There were 54 children onboard the SIEV with no lifejackets. At 2218 with the reef only 1nm ahead and impact in 10 minutes I was standing off with the WARRAMUNGA 1000 yards to the south for my own safety. In a last attempt to avoid a SOLAS incident and loss of life I agreed to embark the PIIs [potential illegal immigrants] for the night. The SIEV then turned south, missing the reef by less than 1 nm.
1.25 The deliberate creation of a potential safety of life at sea situation in order to be taken aboard navy vessels and avoid return to Indonesia has been noted as a common element of the pattern of behaviour by potential unauthorised boat arrivals thwarted in their attempts to reach Australian territory by Operation Relex.
1.26 After embarking the potential illegal immigrants the Warramungaescorted SIEV 3 to Ashmore Lagoon, disembarked the passengers back onto the SIEV the next day, and handed over to the HMAS Geelong. The potential illegal immigrants were later embarked on the HMAS Tobruk and taken to Nauru.
1.27 SIEV5 was intercepted in the vicinity of Ashmore Island on the morning of 12 October 2001. Warnings were passed to the vessel, but it continued into Australia’s contiguous zone.
1.28 The SIEV was boarded and redirected to the north, but on extraction of the boarding party re-entered the contiguous zone. The vessel was escorted to the Ashmore Lagoon. The boat, with about 240 people onboard, remained in custody at the lagoon until 17 October when it was boarded by a party from the HMAS Warramunga, including an Army Transport Security Element, with the intention of returning it to Indonesia. Family groups were transferred to the Warramunga for the voyage to relieve crowding.
1.29 Difficulty was encountered in staring the SIEV’s engine as the ignition key and fuel transfer pump had apparently been thrown overboard, later the cooling pump was found to be unserviceable, with sabotage suspected.
1.30 Although the passengers aboard the vessel remained calm for the duration of the return voyage, when the vessel was handed back to the Indonesian Master on 19 October, 19nm from the nearest Indonesian port, the situation aboard deteriorated.
1.31 According to evidence tabled by Rear Admiral Smith
[A] riot ensued with one group storming the engine room of the SIEV and disabled the engine. Another PII [potential illegal immigrant] lit a fire up forwardand another slashed himself 3 times with a razor blade. Most aggressive PII [potential illegal immigrant] told the Boarding Officer that most would kill themselves if they were returned to ID [Indonesia].
1.32 Some of those previously taken to the Warramungahad to be forcibly returned to the SIEV. The boarding party and transport security element were extracted, and the SIEV was later observed to be underway and heading into Indonesian Territorial Sea, indicating that the engine had been repaired.
1.33 The HMAS Aruntaintercepted SIEV 6 on 19 October north of Christmas Island. Warnings not to enter Australian territory were issued, and the Indonesian crew were reported as stating that their lives were under threat if the boat did not go to Australia.
1.34 The SIEV entered the Australian contiguous zone and was boarded without incident. It was escorted to Christmas Island and the custody of the potential illegal immigrants transferred to the AFP and AQIS.
1.35 A party from the HMAS Warramungareboarded the SIEV on 22 October with the intention of returning it to Indonesia. Family groups and some others were embarked onto the Warramungato relieve overcrowding on the SIEV.
1.36 Extensive sabotage of the SIEV’s engineering plant was discovered, and efforts were made by Warramunga engineers to repair the boat. Those aboard the SIEV responded aggressively, starting fires, tearing up deckboards, attempting to kick out hull planks and ripping the bilge area apart. The situation was serious enough to cause the Warramunga to go to action stations in readiness for a potential safety of life at sea situation, and only resolved when the potential illegal immigrants were shown that they were being videotaped and told that their actions would not assist their case with the Australian government. 
1.37 Repairs were effected by 28 October, and the SIEV was underway towards the Indonesian Territorial Sea. Eleven nautical miles north of Christmas Island problems developed with the bilge pumps, and a decision was made to transfer the passengers to the Warramunga. The SIEV could not be saved and was scuttled by the Warramunga on 29 October. The passengers were disembarked on Christmas Island on 30 October.
1.38 SIEV 7 was notable as a child was dropped overboard by a woman aboard.Those on the vessel also seemed to be aware of the return of SIEV 5 to Indonesia, the first boat to be so returned.
1.39 The boat had been intercepted by the HMAS Bunburyin the vicinity of Ashmore Island on the morning of 22 October.When a boarding party approached the vessel and attempted to give a ‘Notice to Master and Crew’ one man aboard the SIEV dived overboard. Another is reported to have held up a young girl and ‘threatened to throw this child over the side of the vessel’. The child appeared to be aged 4-5 years, and had a cast on one arm. She was noticeably distressed.
1.40 The SIEV was escorted to anchor in Ashmore Lagoon, where eight irate passengers created a disturbance and demanded to know their destination, apparently aware of the return to Indonesia of SIEV 5. On 24 October a further incident occurred, with fifteen people jumping into the water.
1.41 Two members of the boarding party have made sworn statements that a small child was held over the side by a woman passenger, then dropped into the water. The child was recovered by one of the male passengers already in the water, who bought the child back to the SIEV.All of those who entered the water were safely returned to the SIEV.
1.42 On 28 October HMAS Aruntaarrived in Ashmore Lagoon and took control of the SIEV in preparation for its escort back to Indonesian waters.Around ninety passengers from the SIEV were embarked on the Arunta to make room for the steaming party and the Transport Security Element, and the voyage was calm until the passengers were advised that they were to be returned to Indonesia.
1.43 At this point:
Threats of self-harm and deliberate damage to the SIEV were made and attempted. Incidents included threats to jump overboard, threats to throw a child overboard, PIIs [potential illegal immigrants] actually jumping into the water, dousing themselves with fuel, damage to guy wires of SIEV mast, damage to railings, staring a fire in the hold, and splashing of fuel on deck.PIIs [potential illegal immigrants] broke through the SIEV’s engineering space bulkhead but were repelled by the TSE [Transport Security Element] using pepper spray.
1.44 After extraction of the boarding party SIEV 7 followed the Arunta for a period, then headed towards the Indonesian territorial sea.
1.45 SIEV 8 was a boat of Vietnamese origin carrying 31 potential illegal immigrants, initially detected by a Coastwatch aircraft to the north-west of the Tiwi island group on 27 October 2001. HMAS Wollongong intercepted the vessel.
1.46 Initial boarding was uneventful, although the passengers became uncooperative when advised that they were to be escorted to Ashmore Island.
1.47 According to the Commanding Officer of the Wollongong
At approximately 1415, the [unauthorised arrivals] began staging passive protest by de-rigging their awning in the heat of the afternoon sun, sitting on the awning with children and refusing to allow holding party to re-rig the awning. Steaming party reported to me that [unauthorised arrivals] had become angry, were ripping clothes, shouting at the steaming party and gesticulating in a threatening manner.
1.48 The boarding party was able to determine that the agitation on the part of the passengers was caused by their belief that Ashmore was an Indonesian Island. Repeated assurances that it was Australian territory calmed the situation.
1.49 SIEV 9, a 30-35 metre vessel of ferry-like appearance, was detected four miles inside the Australian Territorial Sea in the vicinity of Ashmore Island on 31 October, and issued a warning by HMAS Bunbury.
1.50 The Bunburyboarded the SIEV shortly afterwards, and determined that the fuel lines had recently been cut. A boarding party from the Aruntarelieved the Bunbury, but was unsuccessful in repairing the engine.
1.51 On the morning of 31 October, a riot occurred during which the passengers attempted to kick out the sideboard panels of the vessel. At the same time, a man was observed leaning over the port guard rail with his arms extended holding an infant over the side of the vessel, apparently threatening to drop the child overboard.The transport security element intervened and child was bought safely back onboard.
1.52 This was to be the first of several incidents upon SIEV 9 reported to involve threats to children, although witness statements in relation to the various incidents are not always consistent as to the details of the events, as might be expected in the circumstances.
1.53 In the second of the reported incidents, later on 31 October, the same man who had earlier threatened to throw a child overboard was observed to be roughly holding a small infant, apparently threatening to throw it overboard and in a struggle with a woman who also had hold of part of the child.Some witnesses report that the man held the child over the side of the SIEV before being restrained.
1.54 At the same time as the second incident, a report was made of an attempted strangulation of a child, although a witness to this event described it as a ‘family domestic incident’, as a father prevented his daughter from joining in a riot by grabbing her near the throat region, pushing her to the ground and making her sit down.
1.55 On 1 November, a riot broke out on the SIEV when an attempt was made to take it under tow. Five men jumped overboard, while a woman attempted to throw her young infant overboard, but was restrained.
1.56 In the final incident involving children, a passenger is reported to have threatened to throw a child overboard if not permitted to cook his own food.
1.57 Other incidents abroad SIEV 9 included a hunger strike, threats to boarding party members, and self harm. However it is the frequency and severity of incidents involving children which is notable in regard to this vessel. As summed up by the Commander of the Army contingent aboard SIEV 9 during its transit phase,
During the riots, self harm and threats to children became common place and were not seen to be out of the ordinary, almost a ‘modus operandi’.
1.58 SIEV 9 was eventually towed to Ashmore Lagoon. Once those aboard realised that the vessel would not be returned to Indonesia, ‘the level of tension and belligerence decreased significantly’.The unauthorised arrivals were transferred to HMAS Tobruk on 9 November, and transported to Christmas Island.
1.59 SIEV 11 was an 18 metre long shark boat with a crew of four Indonesians and carrying 18 potential illegal immigrants including fifteen adults, two teenagers and a baby.
1.60 The initial boarding by HMAS Leeuwinon 1 December was uneventful. The boat was taken in tow by HMAS Wollongongtowards Ashmore Island while engine and steering defects were repaired, then commenced passage towards Indonesian waters. By 13 December the passengers had become agitated, asking for UN representation and expressing concern about returning to Indonesia. Some threatened self harm or to jump overboard, but the boat was released without further incident off the Indonesian coast.
1.61 SIEV 12 was intercepted by HMAS Leeuwin 30nm north-west of Ashmore Island on December 16, and boarded before sunrise on December 17.
1.62 The boarding initially proceeded calmly, before a group of young men started ‘yelling and screaming and inciting others to resist us’. According to one of the boarding party,
I saw several of the young males destroy the boom that was being used as a support for a tarpaulin on the foredeck of the SIEV. They then proceeded to tear apart the tarpaulin and they attempted to throw part of it over the side. I saw one of the [unauthorised arrivals] threaten two members of the boarding team with a piece of this boom. At the same time I saw flames coming from the fore part of the vessel. The ship’s boarding party quickly extinguished the fire. I then saw several [unauthorised arrivals] dropping paper, cardboard and other items into the forward hold and noted they were attempting to ignite these items.I also saw several [unauthorised arrivals] freely jumping over the side of the SIEV whilst wearing lifejackets.
1.63 Incidents upon the SIEV 12 during its escort back to Indonesian territorial waters included a report of children held over the side, two incidences of self harm, two occasions of sabotage of the vessel, lighting of fires on three occasions, and four incidences of jumping overboard.
1.64 The vessel was successfully repaired and released near Indonesia on 20 December 2001.
Now keep in mind all this is public record, yet I have NEVER seen mentioned any of these details. The only part the ABC and various commentators parrot is the “children overboard was false” without any mention of numerous other incidents.
The ABC has never played the honest broker in relation to refugee issues, I have see them send a film crew over 1000km to cover a protest by a group of no more than 20 people.
Below is a copy of the email i sent to ABC corporate affairs, I will post the reply, which I am already quite sure will be the standard boilerplate cover-up.
I am writing in regaurd to the ABCs’ reporting on the loss of life incident on board a asylum seekers boat.
I have heard and seen multiple references both online/on TV and on the radio to the “children overboard affair” as a supposed talking point on the current situation.
However it is strikingly obvious the ABC is ignoring a vast body of incidents contained in the same senate report that was so critical of the Howard governments handling of the incident.
I will reproduce the document in its entirety here. I will draw your attention to sections 1.62, 1.55, 1.56, 1.53, 1.51, 1.50, 1.43 (which includes the use of fuel in a threat of self harm), 1.41, 1.39, 1.38, 1.36, 1.31, 1.25, 1.21, 1.4, 1.3.
I wish to know how the ABC, an apparently neutral broker in news reporting can repeat only one fact out of an entire senate investigation while ignoring incidents which are almost identical to the tragedy off the coast?
I have no confidence in the ABC as a reliable news source on this issue. At the least the ABC should be balancing the “children overboard” line with “as happened on other SIEVs'”. At the moment they appear to be trying to give the government of the day cover, rather than reporting the facts
(I have cut out the report as it is allready in this post)
Given the amount of information NOT spoken of by the ABC I consider its current reporting yet more pro-refugee advocacy rather than a news service.
We will see what response that gets, bugger all I should imagine…