Andrew Bolt – Warming to the notion of a con

Is this #17 or #18? The man is a machine.


PS Do get the word out there, folks, on AB’s tips thread tomorrow if you want to keep Andrew’s comments facility going here. I think many have just signed off and/or don’t realise we started this, yet.

Andrew Bolt – All should march orders Rann


Posted in Temp. 3 Comments »

Andrew Bolt – Three dead in the rush for Rudd’s batts


Andrew Bolt – Sing along! “Hide the decline.”




Posted in Temp. 12 Comments »

Andrew Bolt – Now pledge to stop lying


Posted in Temp. 1 Comment »

Andrew Bolt – Julia’s (no) red boa moment


Posted in Temp. 4 Comments »

Andrew Bolt – Obama bowed


Posted in Temp. 7 Comments »

Andrew Bolt – The global warming conspiracy – the trashy Australian data


Kevin Rudds Biggest lie.

From the Australian.

PM vows no family will be worse off

KEVIN Rudd will spend $6 billion less compensating households for higher energy prices, however he has assured families that they will not be worse off.

I will point out why this is a lie, has to be a lie and why he should be called out on it.

basically for an emissions trading scheme to work it must coerce people to consume less of everything that requires energy to manufacture. The plan is to do this by increasing the cost of energy, both in the household (at the Powerpoint), and in industry, transport and shopfronts (the big freezers in Woolies dont run themselves you know).

If it doesnt make people consume less then as a policy its stated aim has completely failed. So it MUST make people spend more on less “items”. It cannot as a policy allow people to consume as much “stuff” as they do now.

The ETS bills also protect low-income families by ensuring they are compensated for 120 per cent of the costs expected to flow from the scheme.


So they can consume 120% more energy/items? This has to be a lie or the whole purpose of an emissions trading scheme fails. It can’t do both, you cannot promise people more “stuff” while at the same time adding a tax to discourage people from getting that “stuff”. It just defies logic, it can’t happen, it contradicts itself.

One of Kevs keen supporters yesterday...

Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Clare Martin said she was confident low-income households would be protected from increases in the cost of living resulting from the CPRS.


Surely we can rely on this group to give us unbiased advice, after all they fought hard against the GST, and its led by this woman, Claire Martin. Im sure the ex-state Premier (Labor) can be relied upon not to play politics eh? Nothing is exempted from a CRPS, nothing…

It has to be a lie, the tax is designed to reduce people getting more “stuff”/using energy, it does this by making “stuff” more expensive to produce via a tax.

The people that actually manufacture “stuff” will pass on the cost of the tax to people buying goods, meaning they can buy less.  Its not rocket science, either hes lying about the impact of the tax on the public (making “stuff” more expensive so you have less) or hes lying about just what the tax is designed to do, which is, make “stuff more expensive so you have less….

So that makes him a lying, smarmy little wax gobblin...

Andrew Bolt – Charity’s fine, donate to mine


Andrew Bolt – Time to audit NASA’s warmists, too

Man, this bloke blogs a lot…


Andrew Bolt – The global warming conspiracy – damage control


Posted in Temp. 3 Comments »

Andrew Bolt – Column – The warming conspiracy’s most damning emails


Andrew Bolt – Feeling hotter now, David?


Posted in Temp. 1 Comment »

Andrew Bolt – Turnbull on the brink


Posted in Temp. 18 Comments »

Andrew Bolt – Their “science”, your cash

Comment here. Ho hum. Gus, it probably won’t work, anyway, LOL.


Posted in Temp. 1 Comment »

Andrew Bolt – Adjust your predictions

Comment here if you want.


Andrew Bolt

Not a surprise, but still a shock, Andrew informed us he’s overwhelmed as of late (certainly no surprise to anyone with even half a brain), and so now Tizona’s will now be running comments on every one of Andrew’s now comment-free posts.

An experiment at best, but since Tizona’s is unaffiliated and non-for-profit, what better a forum to run comments about his posts on?

Yes, this will cut into our drinking time, but it’s a sacrifice we’re willing to make.

First time comments automatically go into the moderation cue, but after that, it’s all guns blazing. This blog is R rated, thus fucking swearing is technically OK.

However we are not fair, and if you wank your left dick too much… er, let’s just acknowledge Bolt’s moderators were very balanced.

We are not. We’ve had it up to here with Leftist crap. That said, you’ll still get a say. Just that abuse will be moderated.

And, naturally, stalking behavior will be curtailed.


%d bloggers like this: