This is absolutely hilarious, though no surprise, really.
“The 1972 discovery of the earliest surviving Quranic manuscripts in the Great Mosque of Sana’a conclusively shows that the present Quran is different from the early manuscripts. It proves the Islamic claim—that the Quran is infallability, that it is Allah’s original revelation word by word, and that it is copy of the version kept in a tablet in heaven—outright false.
… The devastating truth is that a large number of ancient Quranic manuscripts, dating from first century of Hijra were discovered in the Great Mosque of Sana’a (Yemen), which significantly differs from the present standard one. Carbon dating system confirmed that these Qurans are not forged one by religious rivalries. Moreover, these Qurans were discovered by Muslims, not infidels.
This is, probably, the most embarrassing event to Muslims in the 1,400-year history of Islam.”
BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAaaa…
You should read the whole enchilada.
June 18, 2009, 4:59 pm at 4:59 pm
LULZ!!!
June 20, 2009, 2:12 am at 2:12 am
Great find, Beef. Of course, anyone with sense would have known that to be the case, but it’s gratifying to know there’s actual proof.
June 20, 2009, 1:00 pm at 1:00 pm
Well shucks. He ain’t Angus Dei, the beef of God, for nothin’.
June 21, 2009, 11:07 am at 11:07 am
Any political or organised crime enforcement procedural manual would also require periodic revision, particularly over such a long span of years. It’s like the ALP godfather gettin’ ta choose his own gang, not leavin’ it to da caucus!
June 21, 2009, 3:18 pm at 3:18 pm
Watch, the Muslims will burn the manuscripts. Can’t have nasty facts getting in the way of Pravda, now can we?
June 25, 2009, 4:00 am at 4:00 am
iinteresting indeed
June 28, 2009, 3:04 pm at 3:04 pm
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/199901/koran
Cheers